Local Community and Land Tenure Issues
One of the most pressing challenges in land carbon projects is the impact on local communities, particularly Indigenous Peoples. Many projects have been criticized for disregarding land rights and failing to involve local populations in decision-making processes.
There have been significant concerns regarding land grabbing associated with carbon credit schemes in various regions. In some instances, local communities have been displaced from their ancestral lands to make way for carbon projects, resulting in the loss of livelihoods and cultural dislocation. These cases underscore the critical need for carbon projects to respect and protect the land tenure rights of affected communities.
Moreover, the lack of transparency in agreements between private entities and community groups often results in inadequate compensation for local populations. Reports indicate that communities receive little benefit from the proceeds generated by carbon credits, while facing restrictions on their traditional land use practices
Environmental Integrity and Technical Concerns
While land carbon projects aim to enhance carbon sequestration, they can inadvertently lead to biodiversity loss if not managed carefully. The focus on monoculture plantations for carbon offsetting can degrade natural ecosystems and reduce biodiversity. Effective project design must prioritize ecological integrity by incorporating diverse species and maintaining natural habitats.
Moreover, there is a growing recognition of the importance of integrating ecosystem services into carbon projects. By valuing biodiversity alongside carbon sequestration, projects can achieve multiple environmental benefits while ensuring that ecosystems remain resilient against climate change impacts
The technical aspects of implementing land carbon projects present additional hurdles. Accurate baseline calculations are necessary to determine the amount of carbon sequestered; however, these calculations can be complex and resource-intensive.
Capacity building within local communities is essential to overcome these technical challenges. Training programs can empower local populations with the knowledge needed to participate actively in project implementation and monitoring.
Third-party verification is essential for maintaining the credibility of carbon credits generated by land carbon projects. Without independent verification, there is a significant risk of fraud and overstatement of emissions reductions. The involvement of accredited auditors provides an objective assessment of a project’s performance against its claims, which is crucial for building trust among stakeholders, including investors and regulatory bodies
By fostering collaboration among stakeholders—including project developers, local communities, regulatory bodies, and third-party verifiers—land carbon projects can enhance their effectiveness while ensuring they contribute meaningfully to global climate goals. Addressing these challenges will be essential for realizing the full potential of land-based climate solutions while promoting sustainable development practices worldwide.
Facing challenges in land-based carbon projects? Ensure your project is both environmentally sustainable and socially inclusive. With our Feasibility Analysis, you can assess land suitability, evaluate the economic, technical, and environmental viability of your project, and identify risks and opportunities for precise planning. This service also ensures your project respects land tenure rights and meaningfully involves local communities.
Contact us for a Feasibility Analysis tailored to your project and take the first step toward impactful climate solutions. Click here for a free consultation now!
Author: Ainur Subhan
References:
William Onura, Moritz Hauer, Washe Kazungu, and Frederike Klümper (2024) Navigating carbon markets: implications for land rights and community empowerment in Kenya. Retrieved from: https://www.tmg-thinktank.com/blog/navigating-carbon-markets-implications-for-land-rights-and-community
Claire McConnell, Nyaguthii Maina, Sean Woolfrey (2024) Carbon Offset Deals and the Risks of “Green Grabbing”. Retrieved from: https://www.iisd.org/articles/insight/carbon-offset-deals-risks-green-grabbing
NEYEN. (2024) Workshop summary: Forest Carbon Projects – Unlocking opportunities and overcoming challenges. Retrieved from: https://neyen.io/workshop-summary-forest-carbon-projects-unlocking-opportunities-and-overcoming-challenges/
SUCOFINDO (2024) The Role of Third Parties in Greenhouse Gas Verification: Reinforcing Integrity and Credibility of Emission Reports. Retrieved from: https://www.sucofindo.co.id/en/articles/the-role-of-third-parties-in-greenhouse-gas-verification-reinforcing-integrity-and-credibility-of-emission-reports/
t elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.